Comments on: Nike – ‘A Contract with Michael Vick – wtf-LOL – No Not Us!’

By: Max

Max — Mon, 05 Oct 2009 15:50:31 +0000

That is excellent, I have just become a Jimmy Kimmel fan!

By: Will

Will — Mon, 05 Oct 2009 04:17:23 +0000

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2aug-jFhtOg

Jimmy Kimmel put a nice spin on it.

By: Taj Meholick

Taj Meholick — Sun, 04 Oct 2009 12:46:40 +0000

Boycott – Just Do It.

By: Ga dog_lover

Ga dog_lover — Sat, 03 Oct 2009 22:08:28 +0000

I still wouldn’t buy ANYTHING with his name related to it.

By: DogLover332

DogLover332 — Sat, 03 Oct 2009 20:25:14 +0000

I think that if Nike (his former sponsor that pulled their sponsorship from Michael Vick when he broke his contract by not living up to the moral clauses in his agreement).

So it would be absolutely nuts if they did a deal with a guy that broke his contract.

Even if they were looking at him as a new endorsee of Nike products, I think it smacks of rewarding Michael Vick for killing dogs by making him the Nike spokesman to stop dog fighting, a sport that Michael Vick participated in professionally for just as long as he was a professional football player.

By: Mike Neale

Mike Neale — Sat, 03 Oct 2009 20:00:52 +0000

Ya know, it would be a win/win relationship if MV and Nike teamed up to create Nike products to promote “ANTI ANIMAL ABUSE”.

If MV,…or Nike,…really cared about helping STOP ANIMAL abuse, this effort could help!

As it stands today,…we have lost our respect for the NFL,…will never buy anythiing of Nikes’,…and can only live with the solice in knowing the Michael Vick will have to live with himself and his memories,…gonna be tough when he grows up.

By: Ga dog_lover

Ga dog_lover — Sat, 03 Oct 2009 13:23:18 +0000

I guess they decided it wasn’t a good decision! I think they have to realize if “gansta lover”sales outweigh the rest of america’s sales. this wouldn’t have been a good move right before the holidays. we have had quite enough PR Vick.